ESG Data
SoftBank Corp. and major subsidiaries' data related to ESG (Environment, Social, Governance)
on our business activities are disclosed by items.
Employees
| Item [Unit] | Bound-ary | Cover-age | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employees*1 [Persons] | Women | ② | FY25: 100.0% |
15,300 | 19,141 | 19,290 | 19,383 | 21,317 | |
| Men | 30,276 | 35,845 | 36,110 | 35,687 | 37,115 | ||||
| Total | 45,576 | 54,986 | 55,400 | 55,070 | 58,432 | ||||
| Average Temporary Employees*1 [Persons] | ② | FY25: 100.0% |
21,096 | 21,954 | 23,941 | 22,888 | 22,906 | ||
| Average Consecutive Years Served*1 [Years] | Women | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
8.3 | 7.9 | 9.0 | 9.4 | 8.9 | |
| Men | 9.6 | 9.2 | 9.8 | 10.1 | 10.1 | ||||
| Total | 9.2 | 8.8 | 9.6 | 9.9 | 9.7 | ||||
| Average Age of Employees*1 [Age] | Women | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
36.1 | 36.9 | 37.5 | 37.7 | 37.7 | |
| Men | 39.0 | 39.2 | 39.5 | 39.9 | 39.9 | ||||
| Total | 38.1 | 38.4 | 38.8 | 39.1 | 39.1 | ||||
| Age Composition of Employees*1 | [Persons] | 20s | ② | FY25: 100.0% |
10,290 | 11,197 | 10,770 | 9,952 | 10,704 |
| 30s | 17,323 | 20,551 | 20,399 | 20,366 | 21,660 | ||||
| 40s | 13,280 | 16,112 | 16,454 | 16,506 | 17,100 | ||||
| 50s | 5,012 | 6,721 | 7,355 | 7,754 | 8,464 | ||||
| 60s | 192 | 405 | 422 | 492 | 504 | ||||
| [%] | Less than 30 | 22.3 | 20.4 | 19.5 | 18.1 | 18.3 | |||
| 30 to 49 | 66.4 | 66.7 | 66.5 | 66.9 | 66.3 | ||||
| 50 and Older | 11.3 | 13.0 | 14.0 | 15.0 | 15.3 | ||||
| Employees by Management Position*2 [Persons] | Manager Class | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
6,845 | 7,750 | 7,921 | 8,399 | 8,835 | |
| Department Head Class or Above | 2,867 | 3,258 | 3,447 | 3,715 | 3,485 | ||||
| Total | 9,712 | 11,008 | 11,368 | 12,114 | 12,320 | ||||
| Employees Reemployed after Retirement [Persons] | ② | FY25: 74.4% |
144 | 163 | 185 | 215 | 250 | ||
| Employees Absent from Work [Persons] | ② | FY25: 74.4% |
300 | 331 | 430 | 440 | 524 | ||
| Employees Who Took Leave for Nursing Care [Persons] | ② | FY25: 74.4% |
22 | 23 | 22 | 31 | 22 | ||
| Employee Turnover [Persons] | Gender | Women | ① | - | 142 | 155 | 173 | 159 | 191 |
| Men | 522 | 618 | 581 | 553 | 575 | ||||
| Total | 664 | 773 | 754 | 712 | 766 | ||||
| Reason | Voluntary Turnover | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
2,834 | 3,066 | 2,962 | 2,973 | 4,124 | |
| Non-voluntary Turnover | 101 | 146 | 88 | 148 | 168 | ||||
| Total | 2,935 | 3,212 | 3,050 | 3,121 | 4,292 | ||||
| Turnover Rate [%] | Gender | Women | ① | - | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 3.2 |
| Men | 3.4 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.8 | ||||
| Total | 3.1 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.6 | ||||
| Reason | Voluntary Turnover | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
6.1 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 7.3 | |
| Non-voluntary Turnover | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | ||||
| Total | 6.4 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 7.6 | ||||
| Three-year New Graduate Retention Rate [%] | Women | ① | - | - | 84.2 | 91.2 | 84.3 | 91.8 | |
| Men | - | 80.2 | 79.6 | 88.7 | 89.5 | ||||
| Total | - | 81.0 | 82.1 | 87.4 | 90.3 | ||||
| Employee Turnover Due to Nursing Care [Persons] | ① | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Ratio of Annual Paid Leave Taken [%] | Women | ① | - | - | - | 80.8 | 78.5 | 80.6 | |
| Men | - | - | 76.6 | 74.6 | 75.5 | ||||
| Total | 70.1 | 77.3 | 77.7 | 75.7 | 77.0 | ||||
| Total | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
70.2 | 77.7 | 77.5 | 75.3 | 76.3 | ||
| Ratio of Telework*3 [%] | ① | - | 95.9 | 95.7 | 95.3 | 95.1 | 95.1 | ||
| Employees Who Have Taken Days Off for Volunteer Activities [Persons] | ① | - | 56 | 98 | 237 | 285 | 348 | ||
| Ratio of Employees Who Joined the Labor Union [%] | ① | - | 23.8 | 22.7 | 21.6 | 20.6 | 19.4 | ||
- [Notes]
- *1As of March 31 for each fiscal year
- *2As of April 1 for each fiscal year
- *3Ratio of employees who engaged in telework once or more a month
- *1
Recruitment and Diversity
| Item [Unit] | Bound-ary | Cover-age | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newly Hired Employees (New Graduates) [Persons] | Women | ② | FY25: 74.4% |
149 | 234 | 245 | 202 | 230 | |
| Men | 565 | 719 | 709 | 429 | 410 | ||||
| Total | 714 | 953 | 954 | 631 | 640 | ||||
| Newly Hired Employees (Mid-career Workers) [Persons] | Women | ② | FY25: 74.4% |
209 | 238 | 113 | 209 | 237 | |
| Men | 853 | 642 | 313 | 505 | 521 | ||||
| Total | 1,062 | 880 | 426 | 714 | 758 | ||||
| Newly Hired Employees (Employees with Disabilities) [Persons] | ① | - | 32 | 33 | 46 | 36 | 34 | ||
| Ratio of Women to Newly Hired Employees (New Graduates) [%] | ② | FY25: 74.4% |
20.9 | 24.6 | 25.7 | 32.0 | 35.9 | ||
| Foreign Nationals in New Graduates Hired [Persons] | ② | FY25: 74.4% |
54 | 76 | 58 | 35 | 27 | ||
| Ratio of Foreign Nationals to Newly Hired Employees (New Graduates) [%] | ② | FY25: 74.4% |
7.6 | 8.0 | 6.1 | 5.5 | 4.2 | ||
| Average Employment Cost [Thousand yen] | ② | FY25: 74.4% |
1,502 | 1,191 | 877 | 1,503 | 1,492 | ||
| Internal Hiring Rate*1 [%] | ① | - | 81.4 | 85.0 | 87.1 | 86.4 | 86.3 | ||
| Ratio of Female Employees*2 [%] | Revenue-generating Sections*3*4 | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
37.4 | 37.4 | 40.3 | 40.9 | 43.6 | |
| STEM Sections*5 | 17.8 | 18.4 | 16.9 | 17.8 | 18.6 | ||||
| Other Sections*4 | - | 46.5 | 47.2 | 47.5 | 50.3 | ||||
| Total | 33.6 | 34.8 | 34.8 | 35.2 | 36.5 | ||||
| Women in Management Positions*7 [Persons] | Rank | Manager Class | ① | - | 322 | 382 | 423 | 463 | 535 |
| Department Head Class or Above | 56 | 62 | 73 | 86 | 105 | ||||
| Total | 378 | 444 | 496 | 549 | 640 | ||||
| Manager Class | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
1,043 | 1,297 | 1,329 | 1,471 | 1,645 | ||
| Department Head Class or Above | 249 | 296 | 350 | 438 | 407 | ||||
| Total | 1,292 | 1,593 | 1,679 | 1,909 | 2,052 | ||||
| Section | Revenue-generating Sections*3 | ① | - | - | - | - | 170 | 271 | |
| STEM Sections*5 | - | - | - | 93 | 132 | ||||
| Other Sections | - | - | - | 286 | 237 | ||||
| Total | - | - | - | 549 | 640 | ||||
| Revenue-generating Sections*3*6 | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
- | - | - | 779 | 888 | ||
| STEM Sections*5 | - | - | - | 349 | 372 | ||||
| Other Sections*6 | - | - | - | 781 | 792 | ||||
| Total | - | - | - | 1,909 | 2,052 | ||||
| Ratio of Women in Management Positions*7 [%] | Rank | Manager Class | ① | - | 9.1 | 10.3 | 11.0 | 11.7 | 12.7 |
| Department Head Class or Above | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 6.3 | ||||
| Total | 7.6 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 9.9 | 10.9 | ||||
| Manager Class | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
15.2 | 16.7 | 16.8 | 17.5 | 18.6 | ||
| Department Head Class or Above | 8.7 | 9.1 | 10.2 | 11.8 | 11.7 | ||||
| Total | 13.3 | 14.5 | 14.8 | 15.8 | 16.7 | ||||
| Section | Revenue-generating Sections*3 | ① | - | - | - | - | 10.4 | 12.3 | |
| STEM Sections*5 | - | - | - | 5.5 | 6.3 | ||||
| Other Sections | - | - | - | 13.0 | 15.0 | ||||
| Total | - | - | - | 9.9 | 10.9 | ||||
| Revenue-generating Sections*3*6 | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
- | - | - | 20.0 | 19.8 | ||
| STEM Sections*5 | - | - | - | 8.4 | 8.6 | ||||
| Other Sections*6 | - | - | - | 18.6 | 22.2 | ||||
| Total | - | - | - | 15.6 | 16.6 | ||||
| Employees Taking Childcare Leave [Persons] | Women | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
527 | 463 | 491 | 848 | 797 | |
| Men | 347 | 522 | 677 | 908 | 992 | ||||
| Ratio of Employees Taking Childcare Leave [%] | Women | ① | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
| Men | - | 65.5 | 68.5 | 78.2 | 81.4 | ||||
| Women | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 97.6 | ||
| Men | 39.9 | 56.7 | 63.2 | 67.9 | 73.9 | ||||
| Return Rate from Childcare Leave [%] | ① | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||
| Ratio of Employees by Nationality or Region*2 [%] | Japan | ② | FY25: 99.7% |
94.53 | 87.53 | 89.59 | 91.06 | 79.00 | |
| People's Republic of China | 1.76 | 1.53 | 1.36 | 1.50 | 2.02 | ||||
| Republic of Korea | 1.88 | 5.51 | 4.68 | 2.07 | 6.20 | ||||
| Other: Asia | 1.30 | 4.40 | 3.76 | 4.68 | 11.15 | ||||
| North America | 0.19 | 0.47 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.30 | ||||
| Latin America | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.12 | ||||
| Middle East | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | ||||
| Europe | 0.21 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 1.05 | ||||
| Oceania | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.07 | ||||
| Africa | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.06 | ||||
| Ratio of Employees in Management Positions by Nationality or Region*7 [%] | Japan | ② | FY25: 99.7% |
93.27 | 91.11 | 92.55 | 90.81 | 87.17 | |
| People's Republic of China | 0.34 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.76 | ||||
| Republic of Korea | 3.40 | 4.44 | 3.41 | 4.41 | 4.38 | ||||
| Other: Asia | 2.63 | 3.38 | 3.04 | 3.65 | 5.83 | ||||
| North America | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.23 | ||||
| Latin America | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.09 | ||||
| Middle East | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| Europe | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 1.43 | ||||
| Oceania | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 | ||||
| Africa | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.09 | ||||
| Ratio of Employees with Disabilities*8 [%] | ① | - | 2.34 | 2.46 | 2.74 | 2.92 | 3.11 | ||
| ② | FY25: 99.8% |
2.15 | 2.32 | 2.47 | 2.69 | 2.73 | |||
- [Notes]
- *1Internal hiring rate is calculated with the equation: (the number of employees transferred) / (the number of employees transferred + the number of new recruits).
- *2As of March 31 for each fiscal year
- *3The revenue-generating section means the sales section.
- *4Due to a change in definition in FY25, the figures for FY22 to FY24 have been retroactively adjusted.
- *5STEM stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (Engineering and Planning).
- *6Due to a change in definition in FY25, the figures for FY24 have been retroactively adjusted.
- *7As of April 1 for each fiscal year
- *8As of June 1 for each fiscal year
- *1
Personnel Development
| Item [Unit] | Boundary | Coverage | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Period of Training/Personnel Development*1 [Hours/Person] | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
21.5 | 22.8 | 23.1 | 23.9 | 21.1 |
| Average Cost for Training/Personnel Development [Yen/Person] | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
134,478 | 107,779 | 103,625 | 147,716 | 97,384 |
| Human Capital Return on Investment*2*3 [-] | ② | FY25: 100.0% |
3.0 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
- [Notes]
- *1Calculated by multiplying the number of hours of each training held by the number of participants
- *2Calculated as [Total net sales – (Total operating expenses – Total employee-related expenses)] ÷ Total employee-related expenses
- *3Due to a change in definition in FY23, the figures for FY21 to FY22 have been retroactively adjusted.
- *1
Engagement Survey
| Item [Unit] | Boundary | Coverage | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Rate [%] | ① | - | 96.4 | 96.3 | 99.0 | 96.9 | 96.8 | |
| Overall Score*1*2*3*4 [Points] | Women | ① | - | 3.63 | 3.63 (61) |
65 | 65 | 65 |
| Men | 3.63 | 3.63 (61) |
66 | 67 | 67 | |||
| Total | 3.63 | 3.62 (61) |
66 | 66 | 66 | |||
| Ratio of Employees with High Engagement (High Overall Score)*5 [%] | ① | - | 25.6 | 25.3 | 49.9 | 48.6 | 51.2 | |
| ② | FY25: 88.5% |
24.9 | 24.7 | 48.7 | 47.5 | 59.5 | ||
- [Notes]
- *1Overall score: Aggregated values of results related to work, workplace, boss and company
- *2Due to a change in definition in FY23, definitions differ between FY21 to FY22 and from FY23 onward.
- *3In FY21 to FY22, this was scored out of 5 (less than 3.00 = Low, 3.00 to 3.49 = Normal, 3.50 to 3.99 = High, 4.00 or higher = Very high)
From FY23 onward, this is scored out of 100 (less than 50 = Low, 50 to 64 = Normal, 65 to 74 = High, 75 or higher = Very high) - *4Figures shown in parentheses for FY22 are the values under the FY23 definition.
- *5Employees with a score of 4.00 or above in FY21 to FY22, and a score of 65 or above from FY23 onward
- *1
Occupational Health & Safety
| Item [Unit] | Boundary | Coverage | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Working Hours per Year [Hours] | Women | ① | - | - | - | 1,814 | 1,781 | 1,626 | |
| Men | - | - | 1,973 | 1,968 | 1,788 | ||||
| Total | 1,805 | 1,926 | 1,931 | 1,917 | 1,743 | ||||
| Total | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
1,849 | 1,891 | 1,901 | 1,886 | 1,825 | ||
| Average Monthly Overtime Hours [Hours] | ① | - | 27.0 | 24.9 | 24.9 | 24.8 | 24.9 | ||
| Ratio of Employees Who Underwent a Stress Check [%] | ② | FY25: 99.8% |
87.2 | 87.7 | 87.0 | 88.2 | 88.9 | ||
| Ratio of Positive Findings in the Regular Health Examination [%] | ② | FY25: 99.7% |
59.3 | 55.2 | 46.7 | 46.3 | 46.6 | ||
| Completion Rate for Specific Health Guidance [%] | ② | FY25: 95.4% |
56.5 | 51.1 | 45.9 | 47.0 | 49.2 | ||
| Ratio of Employees Who Smoke* [%] | ① | - | 25.8 | 24.7 | 24.5 | 24.4 | 24.4 | ||
| ② | FY25: 98.6% |
22.8 | 21.7 | 18.5 | 16.5 | 16.1 | |||
| Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) [-] | ① | - | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.16 | ||
| Lost Time Incident Rate (LTIR) [-] | ① | - | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.13 | ||
| Major Accidents During Mobile Base Station Construction [Accidents] ★ | ① | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
- [Note]
- *As of March 31 for each fiscal year
- *
Community/Society
| Item [Unit] | Boundary | Coverage | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Amount of Donations*1 [Thousand yen] | ① | - | 286,193 | 118,850 | 107,029 | 4,643,808 | 761,460 |
| Aid for Disaster Victims*2 [Thousand yen] | ① | - | 195 | 2,897 | 3,593 | 2,964 | 2,783 |
- [Notes]
- *1Definition changed in FY25
- *2Total amount of aid donated to areas affected by disasters
- *1
Network Issues
| Item [Unit] | Bound-ary | Cover-age | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major Network Incidents*1 [Incidents] | ① | - | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Network Interruption Frequency per Customer*2 [Interruptions/Person-year] | ① | - | 0.00065927 | 0.00126637 | 0.00024384 | 0.08036178 | 0.00051033 |
| Network Interruption Duration per Customer*2 [Hours/Person-year] | ① | - | 0.0138 | 0.0058 | 0.0048 | 0.0315 | 0.0162 |
- [Notes]
- *1Report based on Article 57 of Enforcement Regulations of Telecommunications Business Act
- *2Calculated based on the disclosure metrics of the SASB (Sustainability Accounting Standards Board) Standards
- *1